
Implicit bias can influence faculty evaluation outcomes. The Office of the Provost strongly encourages FEC members, FEC Chairs, Department Chairs/Directors, and Deans to explore the resources below and actively work to create awareness about implicit bias in the context of faculty evaluation.
UM's Student Evaluation Committee (SEC) process occurs outside the Interfolio system. As such, there are specific instructions for Uploading SEC Recommendations. These instructions only apply to this step. FEC, Chairperson, and Dean recommendations follow the steps outlined in the Uploading Required Committee Documents section.
If a Unit Administrator or Case Manager has set document requirements for a case review step, all required documents must be met before the case can move forward to the next step. A committee document requirement can only be satisfied by the committee manager. Committees can see all documents added to the case at their step or below unless visibility settings are changed. Therefore, committees at the same step can view each other's documents.
Note: If you encounter any issues while uploading, you may need to compress files if you receive an error message. Ensure that the file types you upload are compatible according to the
Committee Managers can fill out and submit a form as part of a case and, if necessary, resubmit a form they have previously submitted. A form can be saved before all required questions are completed and can be made editable again by the original respondent.
Note: The Required Items will say Complete when the required document has been uploaded, even though the required form has not been satisfied.
If responses require management, click Manage Respondents next to the desired form to view responses. If necessary, assigned Committee Managers can make changes using the Edit Submission button.
Question | Response |
Can candidates still submit materials if they have submitted their case and the case has been moved into the workflow? | Yes. Contact the unit Faculty Evaluation Manager to unlock the case section. Once unlocked, the candidate can submit materials regardless of whether the case or section has been submitted and is moving through the workflow steps. |
Can I request a deadline extension for any case review steps? | No, as facilitators of the faculty evaluation process, we are contractually obligated to meet the deadlines set by the collective bargaining agreement. |
Can committee members see documents added in a later step if the case is moved back? | No, committee members can only view documents added on or before their assigned step. For example, if a document is added in step three and the case moves back to step two, members of step two won’t have access to that document. |
Do faculty need to respond after each step of the review process, even if they are not appealing? | Beginning in the 2025-2026 AY, faculty will no longer be required to acknowledge receipt of recommendations after each review process step. Instead, when FE Managers share case materials with a candidate, they will include the following language: “In accordance with the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA §10.220–10.240), you have ten (10) working days from the date this recommendation is shared to submit an appeal, if you wish to do so. If you do not submit an appeal within ten (10) working days, your case will proceed automatically. No further action is required unless you intend to appeal. We will interpret non-response as confirmation that you do not wish to appeal this recommendation.” Candidates will only be required to respond after a case review step if they appeal a decision. |